This one is pretty nice I think.
I hope I didn’t just jinx us π¬
Anyway, this is a nice little watercolor painting. It’s a shame that the artist didn’t sign it.
I hope I didn’t just jinx us π¬
Anyway, this is a nice little watercolor painting. It’s a shame that the artist didn’t sign it.
I honestly can't tell if this is sorta good, or sort of a copout. You tell me..
It feels kinda, slightly, somewhat 1970s-ish. I like it, but I don't "like it" like it.
It's okay. Better than many of the canvases up in here, for sure.
Really nice. Super glad to have this in our gallery. A bit Van Gogh-y. And I mean that as a positive. We could use a lot more landscapes with this degree of heart and talent. Way to go, artiste!
Anyway, as I started to say: I wanted to like this. But I don’t. Don’t get me wrong: it’s almost okay, for what it is. And it is, without a doubt, better than 30% of the paintings exhibited in this gallery. Maybe even better than 31% But…I don’t really like it that much. It feels “low effort.” The stems are wonky. There’s almost no depth. The frog’s arms and hands seem like an afterthought. Probably this was done by an extreme novice, so I won’t gripe too much. And I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that this was a Paint Night painting. If so, it’s one of the sliiiiightly better ones.
Still, it’s just not very good. And it feels plebeian. Paintings of mushrooms and frogs are on the same level as…I dunno…gnomes. And pumpkins.
Sorry π¬
I like the background better than the foreground though.
Thirty. Years.
Four out of six. Not great odds man…
Wellll my “air fresheners in cars” is paintings with an overabundance of black, gray, blue, purple, pink, things in silhouette or any left-unpainted (i.e. white) canvas.
“Find one in every car. You’ll see.”
I am going to be hard put to say anything nice about this…thing. I mean, the moon isn’t even properly circular! It’s egg-shaped!
C’mon man…
I am violently opposed to both it and its Dark Twin, this unsettling Siamese Chimera we see before us. Faugh!
As usual: is it great? Nope. Is it good? Ehhh probably not. But it is…reasonably okay. Yes: the arch and those trees in the background are pretty awful. But at least no trolls or birch trees were involved. So there’s that.
Art!
Very very uninteresting. Sorry.
(Postscript: this thing is so ugly I’ve just now realized that it caused me to mistake a buffalo for a bear.)
“It’s WONDERFUL, child. Keep up the good work! You get four gold stars for your effort!” ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
(Actually I think the blurs are an improvement.)
This thing was framed and behind glass. Done by a kid I’m guessing, and cherished by a parent or older relative for a while. Until it wasn’t.
Sorry.
Oops: a child did this. Disregard everything I said earlier.
This is just wonderful kiddo! Keep up the good work!!! πππ
Judging by the state of the back of this canvas board I’d say this was from the 70s. I could be wrong though.
I just don’t know man…
The background is kind of nice though.