It’s no masterpiece: it’s uninteresting, formulaic, boring. But the colors are kind of nice. And we’ve definitely seen worse.
I can live with it.
I can live with it.
Actually the first two aren’t bad.
The third needs some work.
I can honestly and unironically say that this is, by far, the best painting of pumpkins we’ve ever exhibited here.
I’m genuinely sorry I didn’t buy this :/
Good work, CS!
It’s a solid 3.2 on my One to Ten scale.
And it doesn’t help matters that the trees are wonky and spirally-looking and bent at the top. And that the poor moose looks a bit too much like Bullwinkle. Or (more accurately) Snoopy. Ugh.
(Postscript) The signature got to me. Sigh.
Okay fine. Keep trying CS. Don’t take my mean-spirited and overly-unkind review to heart.
(Haha “to heart”: get it?)
You know what that means? Of course you do! It means that here we have yet another…PAINT NIGHT SUGGESTED SUBJECT!
Whoever invented the concept of “Paint Night” should die a slow and painful death ☠️ ⚰️🪦☠️
Postscript:
If someone can demonstrate that it’s not the work of an amateur, I’ll remove this. Otherwise, it stays.
Seriously.
Okay: blue paint, purple paint, black paint, grey paint, unpainted (white) canvas and things in silhouette.
Thoroughly average, not interesting, yawn-inducing.
I wonder how hard it is to do a bad one with this seemingly semi-formulaic process?
Is it even possible?
Since these all showed up on the same day I think we can safely assume they are all by the same person. Probably a kid (I would hope so, at least) so I won’t be too unkind. They look like what they’re supposed to look like but other than that? Not great…