This one is pretty nice I think.
I hope I didn’t just jinx us 😬
Anyway, this is a nice little watercolor painting. It’s a shame that the artist didn’t sign it.
I hope I didn’t just jinx us 😬
Anyway, this is a nice little watercolor painting. It’s a shame that the artist didn’t sign it.
I honestly can't tell if this is sorta good, or sort of a copout. You tell me..
It feels kinda, slightly, somewhat 1970s-ish. I like it, but I don't "like it" like it.
It's okay. Better than many of the canvases up in here, for sure.
Still not a fan of this kind of thing. We could do with less of them. A machine could make this. Pfft.
Artist: paint something, anything, that is real.
Real is better than not real.
Really nice. Super glad to have this in our gallery. A bit Van Gogh-y. And I mean that as a positive. We could use a lot more landscapes with this degree of heart and talent. Way to go, artiste!
Anyway, as I started to say: I wanted to like this. But I don’t. Don’t get me wrong: it’s almost okay, for what it is. And it is, without a doubt, better than 30% of the paintings exhibited in this gallery. Maybe even better than 31% But…I don’t really like it that much. It feels “low effort.” The stems are wonky. There’s almost no depth. The frog’s arms and hands seem like an afterthought. Probably this was done by an extreme novice, so I won’t gripe too much. And I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that this was a Paint Night painting. If so, it’s one of the sliiiiightly better ones.
Still, it’s just not very good. And it feels plebeian. Paintings of mushrooms and frogs are on the same level as…I dunno…gnomes. And pumpkins.
Sorry 😬
I like it!